The above is the original post.
My response:
Response to my response from a woman named Merrill Aldighieri
My Re-response:
It is written, “Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.”
A constitutional republic is a state in which the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people. They must govern to existing constitution.
In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers can be separated into distinct branches.[1]
That a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, makes the state a republic. The USA is a Constitutional Republic.
Source: Wikipedia.com: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic
A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.
A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States. However in recent years, many people have criticized the federal government for moving away from a Constitutional Republic, as defined by the Constitution, and towards a pure democracy.
Source: Conservapedia.com: http://conservapedia.com/Constitutional_Republic
In a Constitutional Republic such as ours the cornerstone of the foundation rests on the belief of an almighty God, our Creator and that it is He who grants us unalienable rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Because of this cornerstone our rights remain secure because it is God who grants rights not man and since man cannot be God man cannot control this process or usurp God’s authority.
Here are a few rulings from the Supreme Court of The United States of America that help support this position.
"There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.
"The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government." City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
"Waivers of constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences." Brady v U.S., 397 US 742, 90 S. Ct. Rptr. at page 1469.
"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda ~vs~ Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury ~vs~ Madison, 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
The separation of church and state statement is found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut then was later published in a Massachusetts news paper, on January 1, 1802. The correspondence from Mr. Jefferson had nothing to do with insulating government from receiving a moral compass from the Christian roots of which it was obviously founded upon as evidenced in the Declaration of independence and the Constitution of the United states of America, but it had everything to do with barring government from establishing a ruling central church as was the case in England with the Roman Catholic Church. This standing was translated into the writing of the first amendment of the constitution of the United States of America. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..."
I ask you simply. How can you honestly stand so firm in such an obvious state of ignorance? How can you be ok with propagating deceptive propaganda? Do you really believe it is the right of women to burden society with the fallout of their immoral transgressions?
One of the first gifts God gave us was free will, in light of that I guess you can argue that it is your right as a woman to spreads your legs for whom ever, where ever and whenever you want. I guess you could further argue that it is your right to exercise free will in that if the result of your sleeping around produced an unwanted child you could rid yourself of that burden by committing murder, yes I said murder, in fact, you know the risks of such activity so any woman who engages in such activity and uses the procedure of abortion as a safety net is, in truth, premeditating murder. And please don’t try to argue at what degree of development constitutes life. Any biologist can tell you that the individual cells were living independently before they even joined. No person not one has the right to force any other to pay for their transgressions and no person can be made to be obligated to go against their beliefs. No follower of Christ Jesus can be made to go against the will of God for it is written “We must obey God Not man” no matter how loud or how often you shout your deceptive rhetoric. In the name of Christ Jesus I bind you Merrill Aldighieri, be silent you may no longer write and speak your lies and deceptions.
A constitutional republic is a state in which the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people. They must govern to existing constitution.
In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers can be separated into distinct branches.[1]
That a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, makes the state a republic. The USA is a Constitutional Republic.
Source: Wikipedia.com: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic
A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.
A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States. However in recent years, many people have criticized the federal government for moving away from a Constitutional Republic, as defined by the Constitution, and towards a pure democracy.
Source: Conservapedia.com: http://conservapedia.com/Constitutional_Republic
In a Constitutional Republic such as ours the cornerstone of the foundation rests on the belief of an almighty God, our Creator and that it is He who grants us unalienable rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Because of this cornerstone our rights remain secure because it is God who grants rights not man and since man cannot be God man cannot control this process or usurp God’s authority.
Here are a few rulings from the Supreme Court of The United States of America that help support this position.
"There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.
"The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government." City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
"Waivers of constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences." Brady v U.S., 397 US 742, 90 S. Ct. Rptr. at page 1469.
"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda ~vs~ Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury ~vs~ Madison, 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
The separation of church and state statement is found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut then was later published in a Massachusetts news paper, on January 1, 1802. The correspondence from Mr. Jefferson had nothing to do with insulating government from receiving a moral compass from the Christian roots of which it was obviously founded upon as evidenced in the Declaration of independence and the Constitution of the United states of America, but it had everything to do with barring government from establishing a ruling central church as was the case in England with the Roman Catholic Church. This standing was translated into the writing of the first amendment of the constitution of the United States of America. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..."
I ask you simply. How can you honestly stand so firm in such an obvious state of ignorance? How can you be ok with propagating deceptive propaganda? Do you really believe it is the right of women to burden society with the fallout of their immoral transgressions?
One of the first gifts God gave us was free will, in light of that I guess you can argue that it is your right as a woman to spreads your legs for whom ever, where ever and whenever you want. I guess you could further argue that it is your right to exercise free will in that if the result of your sleeping around produced an unwanted child you could rid yourself of that burden by committing murder, yes I said murder, in fact, you know the risks of such activity so any woman who engages in such activity and uses the procedure of abortion as a safety net is, in truth, premeditating murder. And please don’t try to argue at what degree of development constitutes life. Any biologist can tell you that the individual cells were living independently before they even joined. No person not one has the right to force any other to pay for their transgressions and no person can be made to be obligated to go against their beliefs. No follower of Christ Jesus can be made to go against the will of God for it is written “We must obey God Not man” no matter how loud or how often you shout your deceptive rhetoric. In the name of Christ Jesus I bind you Merrill Aldighieri, be silent you may no longer write and speak your lies and deceptions.
No comments:
Post a Comment